When cases like this,the league decides best

After the controversial bump of Boston celtics guard Rajon Rondo,on later fourth quarter pLAYOFF game 1 between the 4th and 5th seeded teams of eastern conference hawks and celtics, the league decides to suspend rajon rondo's appearance the next game of the best of seven series. Although it is most likely to appear that is, a two game suspension must be applied to which the rules of the league implies.The said suspension had been narrowed down to a one game suspension in which they based it not on the rules of the National Basketball Association but to the rules which the series would have bring.Imagine as if the Boston Celtics in a best of seven series will dominate pass hawks without their all-star guard Rondo. Fair enough dated May 2, 2012 of game two between both teams, the celtics pull out an even with the series 1-1 without rondo. Possibility of the win is a 65-35, 65 to win by the hawks and the rest were among hustles to be made. But then still the celtics manage to make an upset over hawks, with also part of the big four Paul Pierce who scored 36 points in an 87-80 win. now what baffles some NBA viewers and critiques is that is it possible that the management decides that inorder for the series to give more great and amazing things happen, the celtics shall win game two. Just to make it even for the fans and viewers not to react. If either the right decision was made, it jeopardizes the leagues rules and bodies and later would be the trending topic all around the basketball community.